Deborah Richmond

A mixed bag of my life as a Head of Biology / Science teacher, and lover of travelling and baking.

5 4 3 2 1 – an idea for starters or plenaries

54321This is a really simple idea but I find it effective in lessons at any key stage and with any topic. The idea is that the teacher tailors questions within a certain topic so that the answers will require ‘5….’ ‘4….’ ‘3….’ and so on.

Here are some examples that I have used in A level Biology:

54321 DNA example 54321 biotech example

Students frequently get very competitive, especially if a time limit is given.

I have used this as both a starter to review key knowledge required for the lesson, and as a plenary to summarise progress made against learning objectives. It is also a great revision tool.

Leave a comment »

Getting the quiet students involved

We are all familiar with the student who never speaks up in class. They are painfully quiet. They are the student whose name we learn last at the start of the academic year, but perhaps they will turn out to be the one student we worry about the most.

It would be wrong to call our quiet students introverts. Yes some genuinely are introverted (as I was at school – how I ever became a teacher is anyone’s guess) but others are more a ‘think before I speak kind of student’. On occasions, where we are short of time to fit in that plenary, the ‘think before I speak’ students just don’t receive ‘thinking’ time they need, so as a result they don’t speak.

extrovert-and-introvert-boss

Of course there’s a second category of students who may be remaining quiet; those who have not engaged with the lesson or task and actually could not contribute to the class discussion. There could be any number of reasons for their non-engagement. Perhaps they genuinely didn’t ‘get it’. Perhaps they are an EAL student so language has been an issue. Perhaps they left home too late to eat breakfast and all they can think about is break time. Perhaps they’ve just spilt up with their girlfriend. There are many more ‘perhaps’ suggestions I could add.

I should point out that I am aiming to tackle the first category of quiet students, rather than the more complicated second category. The second category will require a much more individualised approach and could form several different blog posts in themselves.

Strategies to engage the quiet students

1. Start at the classroom door. Forgive me for stating the obvious but it is so easy to let students bustle into your classroom, while you are searching for their books, displaying your PowerPoint presentation, etc. Be organised. Have everything ready so you can greet all students at the door to make them feel welcome.

2. Use their name regularly. Students feel more valued in their participation if they feel ‘known’ to the class and to the teacher…. Of course they also realise they cannot hide from you.

3. Foster a safe learning environment. Students need to feel both secure and respected in your classroom. If the classroom is more collaborative and exploratory then the positive reinforcement gained from this will hopefully allow quiet students to open up. I shudder at the thought of a student feeling so uneasy in my classroom that they’d rather not be there – akin to a goldfish trying to escape a crowded bowl.

goldfish jumping out of the water

4. Spend time with your quiet students. While circulating your classroom, the noisier students are more likely to command your attention. Make an effort to chat with the quiet ones about their work. Build a rapport with them so they are comfortable sharing ideas with you.

5. Remember to praise regularly. It is so easy to reward the extroverts and miss the quiet students. Praise features like confidence, cooperation and consideration, as well as the academic ones.

6. Think about group work carefully. It may seem like a great idea to place the hard working quiet student with the loud ‘hands up for everything’ student. While both student types are what makes a classroom a great place to be, asking them to work together could be a recipe for disaster. I expect the loud student dominates the conversation,  and the thoughts of the quiet one are not heard. Two possible ways around this are to group students with similar personalities (although this brings its own perils!) or to give each student a role to perform in the group. In fact, this is not an either or situation. I believe that to make any form of group work successful, students need a role.  Assigning roles that suit students’ personalities (researcher, reporter, TV show host, design consultant, and so on) will allow the quiet students to feel comfortable in their group.

6. Give students time to think about and rehearse their answers. For example, pose a question, give discussion time with a partner or time to write an answer, then ask for feedback. This could take the form of the common ‘think, pair, share’ approach to questioning. Yes this takes more time than a snappy short answer question session, but if the questions are carefully thought out it can be far more valuable in assessing deep learning.

7. Give students a way to express themselves in a sheltered way. A way that lies within their comfort zone.  In my experience, quiet students are usually comfortable demonstrate their knowledge by writing it down. Get them to summarise their ideas by writing it on a mini-whiteboard (with the advantage of being able to amend this too), as a Facebook status, a tweet, a text, a blog post, or on a post-it note.

post-it-note-spock

8. Take away the element of teacher choice when selecting pupils to contributeSo if we must ask the quiet ones to speak, not only will rehearsal time help, but also reducing the idea of being ‘picked on’. No teacher aims to ‘pick on’ students, but if you are a quiet student, that is probably exactly how it feels.

Here are some ideas:
a) Have a set of lolly sticks per class. Each lolly stick has one student’s name written on it. Select these at random. Or even get another student to select.
b) Use the Random Name Picker on classtools.net. You need to set it up by adding names in advance but then a simple click leads to a random student being selected.
c) A cuddly toy, inflatable globe, (soft!) football or something similar. You will need to start the process by passing the ball to a student. They answer the first question and pass the ball (the only time I allow throwing in my classroom!) to a student of their choice who answers the next question, and so on. Yes for some students, receiving the ball is their idea of a nightmare but for others it is almost as if the ball gives them permission to speak.

9. Take away the element of students volunteering their answers. To do this, try a no hands up approach to a class discussion. In my opinion, a teacher needs to know their class well enough to establish if this will be a successful approach. After all, it may result in exactly what we are trying to avoid; the confident students dominating the conversation and the quiet students staying quiet. However, if organised well, it can be successful.

Thinking time no hands up

10. Ask students to assess their own participation. Many students are keen to do their teacher proud. Many students will want to improve if there is a blindingly obvious area in which they can do so. Give them the chance by encouraging them to assess their participation and set themselves a target to assist them in that improvement.

After all I have mentioned here, a key point to remember is that it is unlikely that these quiet students will change. Indeed we should not try to change them.  Having been one of them at school, I cannot tell you how demoralising it is for every subject report to say ‘must speak out in class more frequently’. From a teacher point of view, I can see why my teachers were saying that. I was making it incredibly hard for them to judge my progress quickly. Rather our intentions should be more to allow quiet students to realise that we are merely trying to understand how to support their needs.  And for that I hope that some students at least will be grateful.

Please comment below if you have any thoughts on how to further encourage involvement of our quiet students.

5 Comments »

Useful weblinks for AS level Biology

In recent years I have spent a large amount of my A level planning time looking for that perfect animation or YouTube clip to supplement my lessons. At times I’ve found some great ones!

I thought I’d take the time to share some of these finds (though not all of them are great, mostly pretty average), and hopefully save some people some time!

AS level Biology

Cells

Cell ultrastructure (animation and exploratory): http://www.cellsalive.com/cells/cell_model.htm

Cell Cycle (animation): http://www.cellsalive.com/cell_cycle.htm

Mitosis (animation): http://www.cellsalive.com/mitosis.htm

Exchange, breathing, transport in animals

Mechanism of Breathing (animation): http://teachhealthk-12.uthscsa.edu/studentresources/AnatomyofBreathing3.swf

Cardiac Cycle (animation): http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/1135/Links/Animations/Flash/0028-swf_the_cardiac_cy.swf

Control of Heart beat (animation): http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/1135/Links/Animations/Flash/0027-swf_conducting_sys.swf

ECGs (game) – diagnose the problems with cartoon patients’ hearts by setting up and analysing their ECGs: http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/medicine/ecg/

Biological Molecules

DNA structure (YouTube animation): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGHkHMoyC5I
DNA transcription and protein assembly (YouTube animation): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=983lhh20rGY

Diet and Food

Half Ton Son (YouTube video clip from Channel 4): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S30ooGg65E&gl=GB&hl=en-GB

Health and Disease

Cell mediated immune response (YouTube animation – nice introduction to T and B cells): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tBOmG0QMbA
Flu epidemic (game): Can you prevent a flu epidemic? http://www.centreofthecell.org/interactives/flu/index.php

Classification and Evolution

Speciation (animation for students to investigate in groups): http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/darwin/origin/index.html
Please let me know if any of these links are broken by commenting in the space below.
Leave a comment »

Eight way thinking

I saw this idea in a recent teaching and learning meeting in my school. My colleague called it ‘eight way thinking’ and it looks like a simplified form of the multiple intelligences that were popular a number of years ago.

In basic terms, it is a series of questions centred on one particular topic. It could be used as a starter or plenary, or to encourage wider thinking around a research topic.

Here’s a random example to demonstrate:
1. Numbers. How much beer is drunk in the UK every Friday night?
2. Words. Where does the word ‘beer’ come from?
3. People. Who invented beer?
4. Feelings. What emotions are connected with drinking beer?
5. Nature. What are the natural ingredients of beer?
6. Actions. Describe the fermentation stage in the beer making process.
7. Sounds. Which songs were traditionally sung in pubs in 1850s?
8. Sights. How do advertisers make us want to drink more beer?

If I’m honest, I’m yet to find a good topic within science to use this eight way thinking idea. I like the idea because I can see its potential in encouraging students to make links between scientific topics. More thought is required here so I can put it to good use!

Leave a comment »

Embedding plenaries into lessons… A CPD session.

A few years ago, a former colleague and I were asked to lead a CPD session for teaching staff on plenaries. Our intention was to identify different types of plenaries and to develop ways of using them effectively. In no way were we aiming to say ‘we are perfect, follow our lead’. In fact I am sure I will not be the only teacher to admit that on occasions my plenaries really do just get squashed in at the end of the lesson.

In typical teacher style, we assessed prior knowledge and experience before running the CPD session. A quick survey told us that our staff were doing plenaries ‘most of the time’ or ‘sometimes’ with KS3 and KS4 classes, but this dropped to ‘sometimes’ and ‘rarely’ for KS5 classes. Popular reasons for no plenary were ‘forgot’, ‘ran out of time’, ‘lesson didn’t go as planned’ and ‘it wasn’t appropriate for the lesson style’.

In the session, we started by categorising the plenaries that were taking place:

What types of plenary are being used

Most staff acknowledged their plenaries required lower-order thinking. Few required higher-order thinking. Level of challenge in a plenary is important (just like it is in the rest of a lesson); too low and boredom becomes apparent; too high and frustration is a danger. Both of these will reduce motivation. This is a huge generalisation but I have found plenaries requiring lower-order thinking are more suited to younger students or those of lower ability, and higher-order plenaries more suited to older students or those of higher ability. As we all know, there is no ‘one-size fits all’ in teaching but plenaries that are active, accessible and require a degree of challenge will hopefully ensure to engage all students.

So in order to embed the importance of plenaries at all key stages , we set out to consider the benefits of plenaries to both teachers and pupils.

Effective plenaries

Above all, the plenary needs to be an integral part of a lesson, and not just a bolt on. A successful plenary depends upon the effective planning of a whole lesson, however, it is important to have a flexible approach. What I mean is, on the occasions that your carefully planned lesson goes out the window, you need to have a few quick plenary ideas up your sleeve! There are lots of ideas out there. You just need to customise them to suit you and your class. Remember variety though. It is really easy to get into the habit of using the same idea all the time. Hopefully some of the ideas below will help provide that variety.

The ideas have been split into no preparation needed or some preparation needed, and lower-order or higher-order thinking (indicated by L/H on the PowerPoint slide).

Please click to enlarge.

No prep needed comb

Sim and arguments

Relationship and poetry in motion

Storyboard and stages

Word loops or dominoes triominoes

Plenary cubes

By no means was this a one-way information giving session, I was more than enthusiastic to hear the fantastic ideas already taking place in departments around the school. It was also great to hear staff considering how they could adapt our ideas to use in their own subjects.

So, the question I imagine you are all asking is what was the plenary to this session?! Well, it was an adapted form of the plenary cube above (see below). I’ll leave it to you to judge the plenary in terms of engagement, effectiveness and level of challenge! Although I would like to add that the plenary cube itself was the most requested resource out of all resources included in the session.

Plenary cube outline

If you have found the ideas here useful or interesting then you may want to have a look at the links below. Some of the ideas used in this session were sourced from these links. Many of the ideas were then adapted by my colleague, an inspirational AST, who has now retired from teaching.

Fiona Hogg – Starters and Plenaries A great information sheet including what makes a good plenary, some plenary techniques and how to solve problems you may have with plenaries.

Tarsia Software download   Use this to create word loops, dominoes and triominoes. It was originally created for mathematical formulae but can be applied to almost anything.

The Plenary Producer  Added to TES resources by a user named mikegerson. It contains 130 different plenary ideas that can be applied to a variety of subjects.

plenary cubeoutline  This is a link to a blank outline of a plenary cube. You can annotate it however you wish to make your own cubes. I have also provided blank cube outlines to students in a revision lesson. They write questions on them and swap cubes with others to practice as many revision questions as possible.

Feedback is more than welcome in the comments section below.

Leave a comment »

Revision tips and exam technique for Year 12

In November/December, some of this year’s cohort of Year 12 students seemed to be finding it difficult to know what they what they should be doing in their study time. Teachers telling them they should be consolidating their work was not helpful at all. They did not know how to consolidate, and definitely seem to be lacking any form of revision skills. Concerning, as their first exam was merely a month away.

Even for those who have mastered the art of effective consolidation, add in their difficulty in interpreting exam questions, and they will still present you with exam question answers that are either blank (because ‘I didn’t get it, Miss’) or achieve few or no marks.

So I tried to do something to help them.

The link to the PowerPoint described here is at the bottom of this post. It links closely to the OCR AS level F211 Cells, Exchange and Transport exam, but could be amended to suit any year group or exam board.

So I thought I’d start with ‘How to be a successful reviser’ and I split it into four areas.

Step 1: Know what you need to revise

Step 2: Start with your weakest areas

Step 3: Move onto your more confident areas

Step 4: Practice your knowledge and understanding by testing yourself

None of this is groundbreaking stuff but students found the simplicity of the steps reassuring. Each step provides some further tips or breaks the idea down for clarity.

Within step 3, I have introduced some consolidation techniques:

How to consolidate

And I get them to have a go at consolidating the following example into a different visual format:

Consolidation example

There are some other revision suggestions too:

Revision ideas

Then I moved onto exam technique. This is the part that my students found most valuable. I took a single graph of data and asked a series of questions about it. Each question only had one or a few words different to the previous question, but the wording was different enough to require a different focus in their answer i.e. teaching students about the importance of command words.

Here is the first question I used:

Exam technique

All questions used were as follows:

a) Describe the changes in blood pressure from the arteries to the capillaries. [3]

b) Using information from the graph, describe the changes in blood pressure from the arteries to the capillaries. [4]

c) Explain the changes in blood pressure from the arteries to the capillaries. [4]

d) Explain why it is important that blood pressure changes from the arteries to the capillaries. [3]

A mark scheme is provided for each question.

Longer answer questions are a problem too. I anticipate the level of this problem to reduce as we start to take on students who have studied the ‘new GCSE’ that requires scientific literacy in order to be more successful.

In order to provide a scaffold that students can apply to any long answer question, I used Gavin Smart’s (@GavinSmart on Twitter) resource from the TES website. He has called it SIXcess. You can find it on this link: SIXcess – gaining top marks in QWC questions and the slide below is a representation of the key ideas I shared with students.

SIXcess

Of course they were asked to put this into practice by trying out some long answer questions too. You can find those, and the exam board mark schemes in the PowerPoint.

Overall, I had some really positive feedback from the students. I only wish I had put this together sooner. But still, I have it for next year now, and it will definitely serve as a reminder for some students as we head towards the Summer exam season.

Here is the link to the PowerPoint:

Revision and exam technique

Feedback is welcome.

2 Comments »

#ASEConf session summary – Top GCSE grades by teaching outstanding Ofsted lessons

This session was hosted by Martin Reece and Stuart Sherman and endorsed by Science Learning Centres East Midlands.

The session covered three main areas:

  • Latest update on the new Ofsted framework
  • Features of GCSE grades A/A*
  • Possible teaching strategies to assist with meeting Ofsted outstanding descriptors while catering to needs of A/A* grade students

My intention is merely to write an account of what was covered and to share ideas that I already use in my own teaching, along with ideas from the session that I will now try to include. If you are familiar with the new Ofsted framework then you might want to skip the first section.

Latest update on new Ofsted framework
The key facts that were shared with us in this section (in numbered italics below) are all drawn from these key documents:

  • The framework for school inspection – http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/framework-for-school-inspection
  • School inspection handbook – http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/school-inspection-handbook

Key facts

Expect to have very little notice for an inspection

12. The lead inspector will normally inform the school at, or after, midday on the working day before the start of the inspection.

How the ‘quality of a school’ judgement is made

95. In order to make a judgement about the quality of education provided in the school, inspectors must first make four key judgements. These are:

  •  the achievement of pupils at the school
  •  the quality of teaching in the school
  •  the behaviour and safety of pupils at the school.
  •  the quality of leadership in, and management of, the school

98. In judging the quality of education provided by the school, inspectors will decide whether the school is ‘outstanding’ (grade 1), ‘good’ (grade 2), ‘requires improvement’ (grade 3) or ‘inadequate’ (grade 4). ‘Inadequate’ schools will be judged as either having serious weaknesses or requiring special measures. These will be categorised as schools causing concern.

99. Inspection is primarily about evaluating how well individual pupils benefit from their school. It is important to test the school’s response to individual needs by observing how well it helps all pupils to make progress and fulfil their potential.
Depending on the type of school it may be relevant to pay particular attention to the achievement of:

  •  disabled pupils, and those who have special educational needs
  •  those with protected characteristics, as defined by the Equality Act 2010
  •  boys
  •  girls
  •  the highest and lowest attainers
  •  pupils for whom the pupil premium provides support including:
  •  looked after children
  •  pupils known to be eligible for free school meals
  •  children of service families
  •  those receiving alternative provision.

Inspectors are not looking for a preferred methodology in lessons (yes, it definitely says that in the School Inspection handbook). They are looking at quality of teaching and progress over time. In other words, they will look through student exercise books to look at quality of written feedback and they will ask your students if the observed lesson is a typical lesson, or if it is ‘different to a normal lesson’.

Stuart then shared with us the grade descriptors for both a ‘good’ and an ‘outstanding’ quality of teaching. See photo below. Our task was to discuss how we can achieve movement from ‘good’ to ‘outstanding’ by careful planning and effective teaching. Many ideas were discussed rather than written, but I did scrawl a few ideas on the document.

Quality of teaching level descriptors

Features of GCSE grades A/A*

See the photo below for an Edexcel GCSE Science grade A description (from Science 2011).

Example GCSE A grade descriptors

The point here was to notice the similarities between the wording of some parts of the Grade A descriptors and the wording of the Ofsted ‘outstanding’ quality of teaching descriptors. The most notable similarities are in the areas relating to communication (all forms of literacy) and numeracy. This of course, brought us nicely on to the next section of the talk…

Possible teaching strategies to assist with meeting Ofsted outstanding descriptors while catering to needs of A/A* grade students

This section firstly spent a little time understanding and working with Bloom’s taxonomy and linking it to GCSE grades. See the next photo.

Blooms taxonomy linked to GCSE grades

Given an example exam board specification, we were asked to grade each of the numbered descriptors (in the next photo) using Bloom’s taxonomy.

Example specification descriptors

As you can see, the result was messy to say the least. And this was the point. Exam board specifications are not written to build demand. They are just a list of what students need to know. To plan effective lessons that build on prior knowledge and stretch the more able students, the specifications need to be totally unpicked, and linked to Bloom’s taxonomy so that we as teachers are sure that we are spending the required time on more challenging descriptors. Some schemes of work do the ‘unpicking’ well. Others do not.

As we are expected to, I always share lesson objectives with students. From now on, I am going to (try and) make sure that all of my lesson objectives are graded, and use Bloom’s taxonomy style command words so students can easily track their progress against their target grades. These of course are the command words that students will typically meet in exam papers too.

Now back to the communication mentioned earlier. The rest of the session focused on scientific literacy and the quality of written communication (QWC) questions that exam boards have introduced at GCSE level.

Martin shared some facts from AQA GCSE Science higher tier papers from the Summer 2012 cohort. AQA only have one QWC question per paper. I believe that other exam boards may have more than that (although I am not 100% sure). For AQA, it was not the six mark QWC question that higher ability students performed poorly in, it was their ability to ‘explain how or why’ in 4 or 5 mark questions. This indicates that we as teachers need to teach our A/A* students the meaning of the command words and how to write a clear answer i.e. how to spell accurately, use key words appropriately, construct meaningful sentences with those key words, and write well constructed paragraphs. This again links back to the GCSE A grade descriptors and the ‘outstanding’ quality of teaching descriptor.

Ideas to teach extended scientific writing in the classroom

  • Set up a series of questions with increasing demand according to Bloom’s taxonomy, so that students can see the difference in the command words e.g. describe what the liquid in the thermometer does as it gets warmer, explain what the liquid in the thermometer does as it gets warmer.
  • Give students a series of key words related to the answer(s), or through class discussion, get them to come up with key words.
  • Students discuss and put the key words in a logical order. This could be done as a whole class by having student volunteers hold A4 versions of the keywords and the rest of the class order them, or in pairs/groups by giving out post-it notes that keywords are written on to.
  • Allow students to write their answers, encouraging them to ‘pad out’ by including sentences, paragraphs, connectives, etc around the keywords.
  • Provide a mark scheme so they can peer mark their work. Use two stars and a wish. That way students can see their current level/grade and how to progress.
  • Provide a question with a ‘bad’ model answer. Students identify how to improve it and re-write it themselves.

Stuart and Martin were very much advocating the idea of allowing students to ‘think, talk, then write’ as a mechanism for scaffolding their learning of how to write scientifically. Good exam questions answers do not happen by chance. Students who succeed have typically planned their answers. Stuart and Martin also shared this document that can help students in planning their extended answers. I intend to modify this document and pick out the relevant sections next time I focus on extended writing in Science.

A literacy framework for students

To finish, I’d like to add that I’ve seen plenty of brilliant work on improving scientific literacy by other teachers I follow on Twitter. The one that I intend to use in my teaching is Gavin Smart’s (@GavinSmart) resource called SIXCESS – Gaining Top marks for QWC questions in Science: http://www.tes.co.uk/teaching-resource/SIXCESS-Gaining-TOP-marks-for-QWC-in-Science-6212652/

Leave a comment »

It’s about time I started a blog…

So… here we go…

After exploring Twitter a lot over the past year, I have read some thought-provoking and incredibly useful blogs from other tweechers. As I’m sure everyone says, ‘I thought I’d give it a go too’. In fact, I have made it my New Years resolution to start a blog. To those of you who know me well, you’ll know that I don’t often make New Year’s resolutions because I’m rubbish at keeping them. This is one that I hope to keep, mainly because I am keen to record things that others might find useful.

I am going to start the ‘recording of useful things’ later this week by commenting on useful ideas that I’ve seen at the ASE conference…. Watch this space.

Leave a comment »